Overthrow Chapter 8 “We’re Going to Smash Him”
How did Richard Nixon’s views of Latin American Policy differ from JFK’s
JFK: “Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.” “To those people in the huts and villages of half the globe struggling to break the bonds of mass misery, we pledge our best efforts to help them help themselves, for whatever period is required — not because the communists may be doing it, not because we seek their votes, but because it is right. If a free society cannot help the many who are poor, it cannot save the few who are rich.” Alliance for Progress – land reform, progressive taxation, support democratic left. Nixon – former corporate lawyer supports business elite he worked for & military which protects their interests & property
How did Henry Kissinger’s foreign policy views & actions reflect American ideals like the rule of law, human rights and democracy?
Concerned with stability and big-power balance of forces, & US credibility. Knows and cares nothing for the southern part of the world. If a few hundred thousand peasants have to die …. He’s worried about US USSR China nuclear war etc. US credibility is key. Convinced of usefulness of nuclear weapons in war (vs Ike) At one point wants Nixon to appear irrational to scare Soviets in Viet. Turned blind eye to oppression & inequality if “anti-commie” Democracy and Human rights are irrelevant.
What made the US determined to remove Allende & what were similar earlier precedents?
Allende wanted control of his country’s resources – copper and communications – and multi national corporations owned them. Earlier we grabbed Panama to build the canal & overthrew social democratic government in Guatemala at behest of United Fruit, because their unused land was going to be redistributed (after paying them) Taft “dollar diplomacy” also overthrew governments for benefit of US corporations or not .
How did the US plan to get rid of Allende bloodlessly & how well did that work?
We funneled $ to anti-commie “civic groups” and rightist candidates & planted anti-Allende stories in the press. It didn’t work, Allende won a plurality in the election. After that a campaign of “economic, political & psychological warfare” cut off loans and credit, to create disastrous financial situation. CIA helped spread rumors of food rationing, bank collapses, (false) plans to seize private homes. US stopped spare parts deliveries, putting - 1/3 buses and 20% taxis out of service in 2 years trying to “condemn Chilean people to deprivation and poverty”. We supported fascist paramilitary organizations, black-ops. A trucking strike supported by CIA stops food delivery. Military officers who believe in democracy & constitution were assassinated. Military coup kills Allende SEPTEMBER 11, 1973
A GRAVEYARD SMELL
What did American leaders believe about leaders in Iran, Guatemala & Chile and what was the reality? Kremlin directs a unified world-wide conspiracy. If a nationalist leader is not with us he’s against us. They will inevitably be puppets of the Kremlin. Turned out that there was no evidence of any Soviet manipulation and we got rid of leaders who shared American values in Iran & Guatemala. Allende was more radical, but was democratically elected and far from a Soviet puppet.
How did earlier experiences shape American views?
Nazi aggression before WWII was appeased with disastrous results. Nationalists & social democrats were seen as tools of the Soviets and thus forceful resistance was necessary.
How did our treatment of Africa & Latin America differ from how we treated Europe & Japan?
We allowed Europeans to have New Deal style governments, land reform, labor unions and democracy. We overthrew this kind of government in Guatemala or Africa, demanding pure anti-Communism and often supporting thugs and genocide.
Why did John Foster Dulles’ act in Guatemala? How did Dulles’ actions reflect American Ideals? Results? The Guatemalans wanted land reform (as in Germany & Japan) and Dulles cared much more about United Fruit, which he had represented. Dulles was a Nazi supporter earlier, and a strong Social Darwinist with little sympathy for democracy or social justice.
What effect did the coup in Iran in 1954 have on Iran since & the Middle East now? Iran has a fundamentalist government with a huge grudge and paranoia against US. They’re probably trying to get nukes in part because the B43’s have refused to talk and have threatened them. . Iran tried to talk after 9-11 and they’ve helped us against Taliban & other terror after 9-11.
What effects did American actions in Guatemala & Chile have on politics in Latin America?
As JFK predicted it made many fear going the democratic route. Che Guevara was in Guatemala and Castro has used our actions there as an excuse for his authoritarianism.
They Will Have Flies Walking Across Their Eyeballs
(1) What did the Soviet Invasion of Afghanistan in 1979 make America fear?
Soviets were being aggressive and expansionist, taking advantage of our setback in Iran.
(2) What did the Soviets fear? Their Islamic southern republics (“Turkmenistan, Khazakstan & other “stan’s”) would follow the Iranian example and revolt against Soviet colonial masters.
(3) What did US do to make life for Soviets in Afghanistan more miserable? Provide huge amounts of weapons and supplies thru Pakistanis. Carter a little, Reagan goes crazy.
(4) Who did we have to cooperate with to do this & what were features of our “subcontractors” which turned out to be problematic in the long run? We had to cooperate with an increasingly fundamentalist & undemocratic Pakistan which was making and proliferating nukes. We made the Pakistanis build up Islamic fundamentalists, and made the Saudi’s give the fundamentalists money – which was funneled through Bin Laden.
(5) What was the long term result? Who did we end up financing? Reagan helped empower Bin Laden whose thinking has created a world-wide network. 9-11 & the Cole attack and much other terror has resulted, helped a lot by Iraq II.
(6) Why was the US so forgiving of the Taliban before the Africa Embassy bombings? We were hoping to have oil pipeline built through Afghanistan.
Ch 13 THUNDER RUN
(7) Why did Richard Clark have a hard time getting a serious hearing on the threat of Osama Bin Laden in 2001? George Bush doesn’t like complex situations or having to decide disagreements. If there was a meeting there would be disagreement over whether to focus on Iraq or Bin Laden, How did Paul O’Neill describe the situation? We had decided to go after Iraq regardless of any lack of evidence. What was the evidence for Wolfowitz’s views? There was no evidence that Iraq had helped terrorists.
(8) What was the plan for what to do after Thunder Run & what were the expected troop levels in Iraq 60 days after “Thunder Run”? We’d leave quickly and there would only be 30,000 troops after 60 days
(9) What was the Powell Doctrine & who was publicly reprimanded for testifying that it was wise?
Always go in with overwhelming force to make sure chaos does not ensue. Commit whole country with serious debate and commitment of resources. Shinseki was reprimanded & retired.
(10) Who detested the Powell Doctrine and won the debate? Rumsfeld, who believed Iraq could be done with 80,000 troops. Rumsfeld called the Pentagon Bureaucracy our biggest enemy and reprimanded General Shinseki and any other generals who wanted to talk about postwar difficulties. He and B43 remained in denial as reports of an insurgency and then a civil war came more and more persistently from people on the ground.
(11) What country supported Sadaam Hussein strongly in the 1980’s, saving him from defeat when he was doing most of his killing & using poison gas? United States. Who was the Representative of that country? Don Rumsfeld.
(12) Who warned B43 most strongly against attacking Sadaam? Who was he connected to & what did he say? Brent Scocroft who was Bush41’s National Security Advisor. He said it would distract us from the war on terror, be a big gift to Bin Laden, and hurt desperately needed international co-operation against terror. CIA estimates confirm his predictions and then some on recruiting terrorists and we’ve dramatically strengthened the real threat, Iran.
CHAPTER 14 CATASTROPHIC SUCCESS
(13) What did B43 have in common with McKinley when he grabbed the Phillipines? B43 knew very little about Iraq and his administration ignores those who did know, in the Iraq Study Group. B43 believed he was guided by God and involved in a fight between good and evil, so didn’t need to know about culture and identity, such as the differences and conflicts between Shiite & Sunni, which has led to the current civil war. B43 expected US forces would be greeted as liberators and have an easy quick triumph.
(14) What happened to nation re-building in Afghanistan & Why? Reagan ignored Agfhanistan after helping blow it up. Perhaps if “government is the problem” rebuilding good governance is unimportant. B43 was too eager to invade Iraq to invest much time or money in Afghanistan. Both disliked the kind of nation building we did in Japan or Germany. It would also have required cooperation and sharing authority with the UN & Europeans and both Reagan & B43 believed America was uniquely holy and should “go it alone”.
(15) What happened to planning for the post-war in Iraq? It was squelched by Rumsfeld & Cheney. They also, against all advice, allowed the disbanding of the Iraqi army and government, guaranteeing many angry armed men and chaos. Hiring political partisans with no experience also crippled reconstruction planning & execution.
(16) What is the usual effect of “regime change” on American security?
Usually leads to disorder & decreased security because some presidents, don’t care or don’t have the attention span to rebuild. We also sometimes support thugs against JFK’s warning.
(17) Why are corporations so powerful in America & where have their effects been felt in “overthrow” operations? Social Darwinist doctrine (Laissez Faire, Friedman Hayek etc) strong. Lack of progressive or socialist tradition because of ethnic & religious differences stop solidarity), Jeffersonian tradition of suspicion of government
(18) What have been the results in oppressive or threatening regimes of engagement, punishments & rewards instead of overthrow? Engagement and pressure works, overthrow or infantile “not-talking-to-evil” fails. Examples North Korea (Plutonium under UN inspection 24/7 until B43 breaks off relations and threatens), Vietnam started slowly turning capitalist and became a buffer against China when we got out of the way. Cuba has kept Castro almost 50 years. With US engagement would be much better chance of change. With an implacable enemy threatening, authoritarians have an excuse to be authoritarian. China has opened up more and more as she engages with us and the world. Paranoia and violence like Dulles generates the same.
Neatest example of difference Human Rights International Law Progressives and Neoconservatives Manichean good-versus-evil torture-law-be-damned was when Dick Cheney used the Salvador Option death-squads-secret-murder (instead of progressive rebuilding of Germany & Japan as -pacifist-egalitarian-countries) as Iraq model